English UsageComparison guide

Terrorize Someone Into Doing vs. Terrorize Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “terrorize somebody into doing something” for frightening and threatening people until they act as directed. The cited entry directly supports into + -ing; it does not establish terrorize + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent complement pattern.

Quick answer

Use “terrorize someone into doing” for the directly documented pattern; do not infer equal support for “terrorize someone to do.”

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsTerrorize Someone Into Doing, Terrorize Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Terrorize Someone Into Doing vs. Terrorize Someone To Do
MeaningPatternDecision
repeated fear or threats force/pressure someone into an actionterrorize + person + into + -ingUse the directly documented construction.
name the action produced by the intimidationinto + -ingKeep the action after the preposition “into.”
assume a matching direct object + to-infinitive patternterrorize someone to doDo not infer this equivalent from the reviewed evidence.

Quick tests

Intimidation-result test

Do you mean that frightening or threatening someone caused them to perform the following action?

If yes: Use “terrorize someone into doing.”

If no: Choose a construction that matches the different intended relation.

Caveat: The reviewed Oxford entry directly supports “into + -ing” and does not establish a parallel “terrorize + object + to-infinitive” complement.

Examples

Example

The gang terrorized residents into abandoning the area.

The documented construction links intimidation to the resulting action.

Example

Repeated threats terrorized the shopkeepers into closing early.

“Into + -ing” names the action caused by the threats.

Example

The campaign terrorized families into leaving their homes.

The action follows the preposition “into” as an -ing form.

Further guidance

Boundary

The cited entry directly supports into + -ing; it does not establish terrorize + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent complement pattern.

Construction

Oxford directly documents “terrorize somebody into doing something” for frightening and threatening people until they act as directed.

Decision

Use “terrorize someone into doing” for the directly documented pattern; do not infer equal support for “terrorize someone to do.”

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. terrorize verb — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries · Oxford learner-dictionary evidence directly documenting terrorize + object + into + -ing

Related guides

English Usage

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Explore the topic