English UsageComparison guide

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

Quick answer

Use “argue someone into doing” for the directly documented persuasion pattern; do not infer equal support for “argue someone to do.”

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsArgue Someone Into Doing, Argue Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do
MeaningPatternUse it when
persuade a person through reasonsargue + person + into + -ingthe object is persuaded to take the action
ordinary argument/discussionargue + about/over/for/against ...the meaning is not persuasion into an action

Quick tests

Persuasion test

Are you saying that reasons persuaded the person to perform the action?

If yes: Use “argue + person + into + -ing.”

If no: Choose the separate argue construction that matches the intended meaning; do not substitute “argue someone to do.”

Caveat: The reviewed evidence directly supports the into + -ing persuasion pattern, so this guide does not generalize a competing to-infinitive complement.

Examples

Example

She argued him into reconsidering the proposal.

The object is persuaded, and the action follows “into.”

Example

They argued over the proposal for an hour.

This is an ordinary discussion pattern, not the persuasion complement.

Incorrect

She argued him to reconsider the proposal.

Better: She argued him into reconsidering the proposal.

The reviewed persuasion construction uses “into + -ing.”

Further guidance

Boundary

The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

Construction

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons.

Decision

Use “argue someone into doing” for the directly documented persuasion pattern; do not infer equal support for “argue someone to do.”

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. argue into doing phrasal verb — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries · Oxford learner-dictionary evidence directly documenting the argue someone into doing construction

Related guides

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

English Usage

Blackmail Someone Into Doing vs. Blackmail Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents blackmail + object + into + -ing when a threat forces a person to perform an action. Blackmail also takes a direct object without an action complement, and the verb’s legal or everyday sense should be kept separate from the question of which complement is documented.

Explore the topic