Cambridge documents keep + person/thing + from + -ing for prevention. “Keep someone to do” is not the parallel prevention pattern and needs a different structure or meaning.
ReviewedEvidence1 sourceSectionEnglish Usage
Quick answer
Use “keep someone from doing something” when you mean prevent that person from doing it. Do not use “keep someone to do something” as a direct substitute for the prevention construction.
Key details
Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsKeep Someone From Doing, Keep Someone To Do
Further guidance
Boundary
Do not confuse this object-prevention pattern with “keep doing,” where keep means continue or repeatedly perform an activity.
Construction
Keep someone/something from something takes an -ing complement when the prevented event is an action.
Decision
For prevention, use from + -ing. If keep means retain, continue, or cause a state, choose the complement required by that separate sense rather than forcing the same comparison.
Sources and evidence
Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.
Keep + person + -ing describes causing or allowing an activity to continue. Keep + person + to-infinitive is not the corresponding ordinary continuation pattern.
Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.
When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.
Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.
Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.
Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.
