Hinder Someone From Doing vs. Hinder Someone To Do
For an action that is obstructed, standard patterns include hinder + person + from + -ing (and, in some varieties or contexts, hinder + person + in + -ing). “Hinder someone to do” is not the usual corresponding complement.
ReviewedEvidence1 sourceSectionEnglish Usage
Quick answer
Use “hinder someone from doing something” when you mean make the action difficult or prevent progress toward it. Do not normally replace from + -ing with a to-infinitive.
Key details
Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsHinder Someone From Doing, Hinder Someone To Do
Further guidance
Boundary
Hinder does not always mean complete prevention; it can mean making progress difficult, so the semantic strength should match the context.
Construction
Hinder supports an object plus a prepositional -ing complement to identify the obstructed activity.
Decision
Use from + -ing as the straightforward prevention/obstruction pattern; recognize documented in + -ing alternatives where applicable rather than treating to + infinitive as equivalent.
Sources and evidence
Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.
Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.
When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.
Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.
Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.
Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.
Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.
