English UsageComparison guide

Frighten Someone Into Doing vs. Frighten Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents frighten + object + into + -ing for making somebody do something by making them afraid. Frighten can also occur simply with an object or in other phrasal patterns, so the into + -ing construction is specifically for the action produced by fear.

Quick answer

Use “frighten someone into doing something” for the directly documented complement; do not promote “frighten someone to do” to equal status without separate construction evidence.

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsFrighten Someone Into Doing, Frighten Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Frighten Someone Into Doing vs. Frighten Someone To Do
Meaning / situationForm / constructionDecision
fear causes someone to perform an actionfrighten someone into + -ingUse the documented “frighten someone into doing” construction.
frighten takes only an object or a different complementuse the construction documented for that meaningDo not promote “frighten someone to do” as an equal direct complement without evidence.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Does fear cause the person to take the following action?

If yes: Use “frighten someone into” plus the -ing form.

If no: Use another documented “frighten” construction if the action-caused-by-fear meaning is not intended.

Caveat: Oxford directly documents object + into + -ing for causing action through fear; this page does not infer an unsupported parallel “to do” complement.

Examples

Example

The warning frightened him into leaving early.

Fear caused the action expressed by the -ing clause.

Example

The noise frightened the children into running inside.

The construction links fear to the resulting action.

Example

The threat frightened her into changing the password.

The action is presented as a result of fear.

Further guidance

Boundary

Frighten can also occur simply with an object or in other phrasal patterns, so the into + -ing construction is specifically for the action produced by fear.

Construction

Oxford directly documents frighten + object + into + -ing for making somebody do something by making them afraid.

Decision

Use “frighten someone into doing something” for the directly documented complement; do not promote “frighten someone to do” to equal status without separate construction evidence.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. frighten into doing — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries · Frighten + object + into + -ing construction

Related guides

English Usage

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Explore the topic