English UsageComparison guide

Entrap Someone Into Doing vs. Entrap Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “entrap somebody into doing something” in the legal sense of tricking and encouraging someone to commit an act so they can be arrested. The cited entry directly supports into + -ing in that legal sense; it does not establish entrap + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent complement pattern.

Quick answer

Use “entrap someone into doing” for the directly documented legal construction; do not infer equal support for “entrap someone to do.”

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsEntrap Someone Into Doing, Entrap Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Entrap Someone Into Doing vs. Entrap Someone To Do
Meaning / situationForm / constructionDecision
legal sense: trick or induce a person into an act so the person can be caughtentrap + person + into + -ingUse the directly documented legal construction.
trying to form an equivalent with a to-infinitiveentrap + person + to + verbDo not present this as equally supported by the reviewed entry.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Are you expressing the documented legal sense of inducing someone into committing an act?

If yes: Use “entrap someone into doing something.”

If no: Do not infer “entrap someone to do” as an interchangeable complement from this evidence.

Caveat: The source supports the “into + -ing” legal construction; this guide does not broaden that evidence into a general claim about every figurative use of “entrap.”

Examples

Example

The defense argued that the officer entrapped him into committing the offence.

The sentence uses the directly documented into + -ing legal pattern.

Example

They claimed the suspect had been entrapped into taking part.

The passive form retains the “into + -ing” complement.

Example

The allegation was that agents entrapped her into making the transaction.

The participant is explicit and the act follows “into.”

Further guidance

Boundary

The cited entry directly supports into + -ing in that legal sense; it does not establish entrap + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent complement pattern.

Construction

Oxford directly documents “entrap somebody into doing something” in the legal sense of tricking and encouraging someone to commit an act so they can be arrested.

Decision

Use “entrap someone into doing” for the directly documented legal construction; do not infer equal support for “entrap someone to do.”

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. entrap verb — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries · Oxford learner-dictionary evidence directly documenting entrap + object + into + -ing in the legal sense

Related guides

English Usage

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Explore the topic