English UsageComparison guide

Dupe Someone Into Doing vs. Dupe Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents dupe someone into doing something for deception that causes someone to do something. The cited entry directly supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish dupe + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Quick answer

Use “dupe someone into doing something” for the directly documented pattern; do not infer equal support for “dupe someone to do.”

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsDupe Someone Into Doing, Dupe Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Dupe Someone Into Doing vs. Dupe Someone To Do
Meaning / situationForm / constructionDecision
deception causes someone to perform an actiondupe someone into doing somethingUse into + -ing for the directly documented pattern.
deception causes someone to accept or enter a situationdupe someone into + noun / situationKeep the “into” construction when a noun names the result or situation.
object + to-infinitive is proposed as an equivalent complementdo not infer dupe someone to doThe reviewed source does not establish that pattern for this meaning.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Are you describing deception that causes someone to do an action?

If yes: Use “dupe someone into doing …”.

If no: If “dupe” is used differently, follow the construction supported for that sense rather than assuming object + to-infinitive is interchangeable.

Caveat: The reviewed entry directly supports “dupe someone into doing something” for this causative-deception sense.

Examples

Example

The message duped him into revealing his password.

The action follows the documented into + -ing pattern.

Example

They were duped into paying an unnecessary fee.

The passive form preserves “into” + -ing.

Example

The fake offer duped several people into signing up.

The deception leads to an action expressed with -ing.

Further guidance

Boundary

The cited entry directly supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish dupe + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Construction

Cambridge directly documents dupe someone into doing something for deception that causes someone to do something.

Decision

Use “dupe someone into doing something” for the directly documented pattern; do not infer equal support for “dupe someone to do.”

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. dupe someone into doing something — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge Dictionary · Dictionary construction dupe someone into doing something

Related guides

English Usage

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Explore the topic