English UsageComparison guide

Drive Someone Into Doing vs. Drive Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “drive somebody to do something” for forcing or causing someone to act in a particular way. The cited causative sense directly supports object + to-infinitive; physical drive + object + into a place is a different construction and does not license an inferred into + -ing complement here.

Quick answer

Use “drive someone to do” for the directly documented causative pattern; do not infer “drive someone into doing” from unrelated physical into constructions.

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familyverb-complement and object pattern
TermsDrive Someone Into Doing, Drive Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Drive Someone Into Doing vs. Drive Someone To Do
Meaning / situationForm / constructionDecision
pressure or circumstances cause someone to actdrive someone to do somethingUse object + to-infinitive for the directly documented causative sense.
a vehicle or person is moved into a physical placedrive someone/something into + placeThis is a different physical construction.
into + -ing is proposed as if it were licensed by the physical constructiondo not infer drive someone into doingThe reviewed causative entry supports “to do,” not that inferred pattern.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Does “drive” mean cause or force someone to take an action?

If yes: Use “drive someone to do …”.

If no: If “into” names a physical destination, treat that as a different construction; do not use it as evidence for an into + -ing causative pattern.

Caveat: The evidence distinguishes the causative “drive someone to do” pattern from unrelated physical “drive … into” constructions.

Examples

Example

The delays drove the team to revise the schedule.

The causative sense uses object + to-infinitive.

Example

Fear drove him to leave early.

The sentence uses the directly documented causative pattern.

Example

She drove the car into the garage.

Here “into” introduces a physical destination, not an -ing action complement.

Further guidance

Boundary

The cited causative sense directly supports object + to-infinitive; physical drive + object + into a place is a different construction and does not license an inferred into + -ing complement here.

Construction

Oxford directly documents “drive somebody to do something” for forcing or causing someone to act in a particular way.

Decision

Use “drive someone to do” for the directly documented causative pattern; do not infer “drive someone into doing” from unrelated physical into constructions.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. drive — Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries (opens in a new tab)Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries · Direct construction evidence for drive somebody to do something in the causative sense

Related guides

English Usage

Argue Someone Into Doing vs. Argue Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents “argue somebody into doing something” for persuading somebody by giving reasons. The cited construction evidence directly supports into + -ing; it does not license “argue someone to do” as an equivalent complement pattern.

English Usage

Ask Someone To Do vs. Ask Doing

When ask means request an action from a person, Cambridge documents ask + person + to-infinitive. Bare “ask doing” is not the ordinary request complement for that meaning.

English Usage

Badger Someone Into Doing vs. Badger Someone To Do

Cambridge directly documents both badger + object + into + -ing and badger + object + to-infinitive for repeated pressure or requests that push someone toward an action. The verb also covers repeated questioning, so context must show whether the sentence is about persistent persuasion or interrogation rather than assuming every use names a requested action.

English Usage

Bamboozle Someone Into Doing vs. Bamboozle Someone To Do

Cambridge directly illustrates bamboozle + object + into + -ing for deceiving someone so that the person takes an action. The cited entry does not establish bamboozle + object + to-infinitive as an equally documented alternative, so this guide does not manufacture a two-way rule.

English Usage

Beg Someone To Do vs. Beg Doing

Cambridge explicitly documents beg + object + to-infinitive for an urgent request and also records beg for + noun and other request patterns. A following -ing form may appear elsewhere in a sentence, but it is not the ordinary replacement for the documented object + to-infinitive request construction.

English Usage

Beguile Someone Into Doing vs. Beguile Someone To Do

Cambridge gives direct evidence for beguile someone into doing something in the literary persuade/attract/deceive sense. The cited entry supports the into + -ing construction; it does not establish beguile + object + to-infinitive as an equivalent pattern for this meaning.

Explore the topic