English UsageComparison guide

Starve Someone Into Doing vs. Starve Someone To Do

Oxford directly documents starve + person + into + -ing for coercing an action by deprivation. The cited entry does not license person + to-infinitive as the parallel complement, and ordinary senses of starve remain separate.

Quick answer

Use “starve someone into doing something” for the documented coercive construction; do not infer “starve someone to do” as an equivalent complement.

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familypreposition and verb-complement pattern
TermsStarve Someone Into Doing, Starve Someone To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Starve Someone Into Doing vs. Starve Someone To Do
Meaning / structurePatternDecision
coerce someone by deprivation into an actionstarve + object + into + -ingUse the directly documented construction.
ordinary literal or figurative senses of starvechoose the structure required by that senseDo not force the coercive pattern onto unrelated uses.
object + to-infinitive as an equivalent coercive complementstarve + object + to doDo not infer this from the reviewed evidence.

Quick tests

Coercive-construction test

Does “starve” mean force a person or group into an action by withholding food, money, or resources?

If yes: Use “starve + object + into + -ing.”

If no: Use the construction appropriate to the ordinary literal or figurative sense instead.

Caveat: This page supports the documented “into + -ing” coercive construction; it does not license object + to-infinitive as an equivalent.

Examples

Example

The negotiators tried to starve the other side into accepting the terms.

The object is followed by “into” plus an -ing form in the documented coercive pattern.

Example

They hoped to starve the group into changing its position.

“Into changing” expresses the action produced by coercive deprivation.

Example

For the coercive sense, use “starve someone into doing” rather than assuming “starve someone to do” is the parallel complement.

The reviewed source directly supports the into + -ing construction.

Further guidance

Boundary

Starve also has ordinary literal and figurative senses, so not every use belongs to the into + -ing construction.

Construction

Oxford directly records “starve somebody into something/into doing something” for forcing action by withholding food or money.

Decision

Use “starve someone into doing something” for the documented coercive construction; do not infer “starve someone to do” as an equivalent complement.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. starve into doing — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford University Press · Oxford learner-dictionary construction evidence for starve somebody into doing something

Related guides

English Usage

Accustomed To Doing vs. Accustomed To Do

Cambridge records accustomed to something and gives -ing examples such as being accustomed to working or being treated in a particular way. Do not interpret the “to” after accustomed as an infinitive marker in this construction.

English Usage

Adapt To Doing vs. Adapt To Do

Cambridge distinguishes adapt to a situation or activity from transitive patterns such as adapting plans to fit new circumstances. The surface sequence “adapt … to + verb” therefore needs its grammatical structure identified before choosing an -ing form or infinitive.

English Usage

Apologize For Doing vs. Apologize To Do

Cambridge distinguishes “apologize to someone” from “apologize for something/doing something.” You can combine the two roles, as in “apologize to someone for doing something”; “to” marks the recipient while “for” marks the reason.

English Usage

Approve Of Doing vs. Approve To Do

Cambridge distinguishes intransitive “approve of” for a favorable opinion from transitive “approve something” for official acceptance or authorization. The official-authorization sense uses transitive “approve” with an object; do not collapse that separate sense into the “approve of doing” judgment pattern.

English Usage

Ban Someone From Doing vs. Ban Someone To Do

Oxford documents the person-action pattern as be banned + from + -ing and separately documents direct-object uses of ban. The cited evidence does not support person + to-infinitive as the equivalent prohibition construction.

Explore the topic