English UsageComparison guide

Stank vs. Stunk

“Stank” is the usual simple past of “stink”; “stunk” is the past participle and is also recorded as a simple-past variant in US and Australian English. The guide preserves documented regional or alternate forms rather than treating the pair as an absolute binary.

Quick answer

“Stank” is the usual simple past of “stink”; “stunk” is the past participle and is also recorded as a simple-past variant in US and Australian English.

Key details

Confusion Familyirregular verb forms
Rule Familyverb forms
Termsstank, stunk
Verb Formsstink, stank (also stunk in US and Australian English), stunk

Choose the right form

Decision table for Stank vs. Stunk
Sentence needUseDecision
neutral simple paststankUse the broadly useful simple-past form.
past participle after have/has/hadstunkUse the participle.
US or Australian simple paststunk is also documentedTreat this as a regional variant, not an error.

Quick tests

Verb-form and region test

Is the verb governed by have, has, or had?

If yes: Use “stunk.”

If no: For a neutral simple past, use “stank”; US and Australian English also document simple-past “stunk.”

Caveat: The simple-past contrast is not absolute because Cambridge records regional simple-past “stunk.”

Examples

Example

The room stank after the spill.

“Stank” is the broadly useful simple-past form.

Example

The room had stunk for hours before it was aired out.

“Stunk” is the past participle after “had.”

Example

In US or Australian English, “The room stunk” is also a documented simple-past pattern.

Simple-past “stunk” is a regional alternative rather than a separate meaning.

Usage notes

Stank vs. Stunk

The contrast is not absolute: Cambridge records “stunk” as an additional simple-past form in US and Australian English.

Further guidance

Core difference

“Stank” is the usual simple-past form of “stink.” “Stunk” is the past participle, while Cambridge also records “stunk” as a simple-past form in US and Australian English.

Fast Test

For a neutral simple-past sentence, “stank” is the broadly useful choice. After have/has/had, use “stunk.” In US and Australian English, simple-past “stunk” is also documented.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. Stink — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge University Press · Direct verb-form evidence for stink, stank/stunk, stunk, including the recorded US/Australian simple-past stunk variant.

Related guides

English Usage

Ate vs. Eaten

“Ate” and “eaten” are different forms of the irregular verb “eat.” “Ate” is the simple past, while “eaten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Awoke vs. Awoken

“Awoke” is the simple-past form of the literary verb “awake,” while “awoken” is its past participle. Cambridge also records “awaked” as a US simple-past variant, so the guide keeps that regional option visible.

English Usage

Beat vs. Beaten

“Beat” and “beaten” are different forms of the irregular verb “beat.” “Beat” is the simple past, while “beaten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Became vs. Become

“Became” and “become” are different forms of the irregular verb “become.” “Became” is the simple past, while “become” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Began vs. Begun

“Began” and “begun” are different forms of the irregular verb “begin.” “Began” is the simple past, while “begun” is the past participle used in perfect constructions and, where applicable, passive constructions.

English Usage

Bit vs. Bitten

“Bit” and “bitten” are different forms of the irregular verb “bite.” “Bit” is the simple past, while “bitten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

Explore the topic