English UsageComparison guide

Sowed vs. Sown

“Sowed” is the simple past of “sow.” For the past participle, Cambridge records both “sown” and “sowed,” so “sown” is participial only while “sowed” can serve either past role.

Quick answer

Use “sowed” for the simple past. For the past participle, both “sown” and “sowed” are documented, so “has sown” and “has sowed” can both be standard.

Key details

Confusion Familyirregular verb forms
Participle VariationCambridge lists sown or sowed as past participles.
Rule Familyverb forms
Termssowed, sown
Verb Formssow, sowed, sown or sowed

Choose the right form

Decision table for Sowed vs. Sown
Sentence needFormDecision
simple past of “sow”sowedUse “sowed.”
past participle after have/has/had or in a passivesown“Sown” is a documented participle.
past participle where the regular alternative is preferredsowedCambridge also records “sowed” as a past participle.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Is the verb a standalone simple past rather than a past participle?

If yes: Use “sowed.”

If no: For a past participle, both “sown” and “sowed” are documented.

Caveat: The usual past-versus-participle shortcut is not absolute here because “sowed” can also serve as a past participle.

Examples

Example

They sowed the field in early spring.

“Sowed” is the simple-past form.

Example

The field had been sown before the rain arrived.

“Sown” is a documented past participle in a perfect passive construction.

Example

They have sowed this variety before.

Cambridge also records “sowed” as a past participle, so this form is not automatically an error.

Further guidance

Core difference

“Sowed” is the simple-past form and can also be a past participle; “sown” is a past-participle form.

Fast Test

A simple past takes “sowed.” After have/has/had, either “sown” or “sowed” is documented, so do not mark “has sowed” wrong merely because “sown” is more familiar.

Variation Boundary

Because “sowed” is also an accepted past participle, the usual simple-past-versus-participle shortcut is not absolute for this verb.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. SOW — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge University Press · Direct dictionary evidence for sow / sowed / sown or sowed verb forms

Related guides

English Usage

Ate vs. Eaten

“Ate” and “eaten” are different forms of the irregular verb “eat.” “Ate” is the simple past, while “eaten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Awoke vs. Awoken

“Awoke” is the simple-past form of the literary verb “awake,” while “awoken” is its past participle. Cambridge also records “awaked” as a US simple-past variant, so the guide keeps that regional option visible.

English Usage

Beat vs. Beaten

“Beat” and “beaten” are different forms of the irregular verb “beat.” “Beat” is the simple past, while “beaten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Became vs. Become

“Became” and “become” are different forms of the irregular verb “become.” “Became” is the simple past, while “become” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

English Usage

Began vs. Begun

“Began” and “begun” are different forms of the irregular verb “begin.” “Began” is the simple past, while “begun” is the past participle used in perfect constructions and, where applicable, passive constructions.

English Usage

Bit vs. Bitten

“Bit” and “bitten” are different forms of the irregular verb “bite.” “Bit” is the simple past, while “bitten” is the past participle used in perfect constructions.

Explore the topic