English UsageComparison guide

Mowed vs. Mown

The forms are not fully interchangeable: Cambridge gives “mowed” for the simple past and allows “mown” or “mowed” for the past participle. The grammatical slot therefore matters.

Quick answer

Use “mowed” for the simple past; for the past participle, both “mown” and “mowed” are documented.

Key details

Confusion Familyparticiple variant
Rule Familyverb forms
Termsmowed, mown
Variant ScopeCambridge records mowed as the past tense and mown or mowed as past participles.

Further guidance

Core difference

Use “mowed” for the simple past; for the past participle, both “mown” and “mowed” are documented.

Fast Test

If there is no auxiliary and you need a simple past, choose “mowed.” After “has/have/had” or adjectivally, “mown” or “mowed” may be available.

Grammar Boundary

“Mown” is participial rather than the ordinary simple-past form in the cited paradigm, so “I mown the lawn yesterday” does not follow that pattern.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. MOW — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge University Press · Direct dictionary evidence for mowed and mown/mowed participle forms

Explore the topic