English UsageComparison guide

Insist On Doing vs. Insist To Do

Cambridge records “insist on something/doing something” for demanding or continuing an action. “Insist to do” is not the parallel direct-complement pattern. Other valid insist patterns include “insist that …” and “insist on” followed by a noun phrase; this guide is only about the direct action complement.

Quick answer

Use “insist on doing” when insist is followed directly by the action someone demands or persists in doing; “on” is part of the construction and the action takes an -ing form.

Key details

Confusion Familygrammar-and-usage distinction
Rule Familypreposition and verb-complement pattern
TermsInsist On Doing, Insist To Do

Choose the right form

Decision table for Insist On Doing vs. Insist To Do
Meaning / situationForm / constructionDecision
speaker persists in performing an actioninsist on + -ingUse “insist on doing.”
speaker demands that another clause be true or action occurinsist that + clauseUse a that-clause when that structure fits.

Quick tests

Meaning / construction test

Is “insist” followed directly by the action the subject persists in doing?

If yes: Use “insist on” followed by an -ing form.

If no: If you need a full clause, use the appropriate “insist that ...” construction rather than “insist to do.”

Caveat: The guide covers the direct action complement; “insist” also occurs with that-clauses and other constructions.

Examples

Example

She insisted on paying for the meal.

“On + -ing” names the action she persisted in doing.

Example

They insist on checking every shipment.

The direct action complement uses “on” plus a gerund.

Example

He insisted that the figures were correct.

A that-clause is a different valid construction.

Further guidance

Boundary

Other valid insist patterns include “insist that …” and “insist on” followed by a noun phrase; this guide is only about the direct action complement.

Construction

Cambridge records “insist on something/doing something” for demanding or continuing an action. “Insist to do” is not the parallel direct-complement pattern.

Decision

Use “insist on doing” when insist is followed directly by the action someone demands or persists in doing; “on” is part of the construction and the action takes an -ing form.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. insist on doing something — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge Dictionary · Insist on something/doing something is the documented construction for demanding or persisting in an action.

Related guides

English Usage

Accustomed To Doing vs. Accustomed To Do

Cambridge records accustomed to something and gives -ing examples such as being accustomed to working or being treated in a particular way. Do not interpret the “to” after accustomed as an infinitive marker in this construction.

English Usage

Adapt To Doing vs. Adapt To Do

Cambridge distinguishes adapt to a situation or activity from transitive patterns such as adapting plans to fit new circumstances. The surface sequence “adapt … to + verb” therefore needs its grammatical structure identified before choosing an -ing form or infinitive.

English Usage

Apologize For Doing vs. Apologize To Do

Cambridge distinguishes “apologize to someone” from “apologize for something/doing something.” You can combine the two roles, as in “apologize to someone for doing something”; “to” marks the recipient while “for” marks the reason.

English Usage

Approve Of Doing vs. Approve To Do

Cambridge distinguishes intransitive “approve of” for a favorable opinion from transitive “approve something” for official acceptance or authorization. The official-authorization sense uses transitive “approve” with an object; do not collapse that separate sense into the “approve of doing” judgment pattern.

English Usage

Ban Someone From Doing vs. Ban Someone To Do

Oxford documents the person-action pattern as be banned + from + -ing and separately documents direct-object uses of ban. The cited evidence does not support person + to-infinitive as the equivalent prohibition construction.

Explore the topic