English UsageComparison guide

Forecast vs. Forecasted

Both “forecast” and “forecasted” are documented as past-tense and past-participle forms of the verb “forecast.” Neither form should be treated as universally incorrect.

Quick answer

Both “forecast” and “forecasted” are standard past forms; use the form that matches your style and sentence.

Key details

Confusion Familyalternative past forms
Rule Familyverb-forms
TermsForecast, Forecasted

Further guidance

Core difference

Cambridge records both “forecast” and “forecasted” as past-tense and past-participle forms of the verb “forecast.”

Usage Boundary

Do not label “forecasted” incorrect simply because “forecast” is also used as the past form. Follow established usage and house style consistently.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. Forecast — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge Dictionary · Dictionary evidence that both “forecast” and “forecasted” are documented past-tense and participle forms of forecast.

Related guides

English Usage

Speeded vs. Sped

Both “sped” and “speeded” are documented past-tense and past-participle forms of “speed.” The choice can depend on construction and style rather than a universal correctness rule.

English Usage

Strived vs. Strove

“Strove” and “strived” are both documented past-tense forms of “strive.” Cambridge also records “striven” and “strived” as past participles, so the choice depends partly on tense and the verb pattern you are using.

Explore the topic