English UsageComparison guide

Be Eligible To Do vs. Eligible For Something

Be Eligible To Do vs. Eligible For Something distinguishes Oxford’s directly documented eligible to + verb and eligible for + noun phrase patterns. The choice depends on whether eligibility is framed as an action or as eligibility for a benefit, status, role, or other noun phrase.

Quick answer

Use eligible to + verb for an action a person has the right or qualifications to perform; use eligible for + noun phrase for a benefit, status, role, or other thing they may receive or enter.

Key details

Confusion Familyusage-construction
Rule Familyconstruction choice
Termseligible + to-infinitive, eligible for + noun phrase

Choose the right form

Decision table for Be Eligible To Do vs. Eligible For Something
Meaning / situationConstructionDecision
right or qualification to perform an actioneligible to + verbstate the action the person may perform
qualification for a benefit, role, status, or thingeligible for + noun phrasename the benefit/status/thing

Quick tests

Action-or-benefit test

Is eligibility being framed as permission/qualification to act, or eligibility for a named thing/status?

If yes: Use “eligible to + verb” for the action.

If no: Use “eligible for + noun phrase” for the benefit, role, status, or thing.

Caveat: Eligibility criteria themselves are domain-specific; this guide addresses only the English complement choice.

Examples

Example

Employees who meet the criteria are eligible to apply.

The infinitive names the permitted action.

Example

The applicant is eligible for the grant.

“For” introduces the benefit.

Example

She is eligible for membership.

The noun names the status or opportunity for which she qualifies.

Further guidance

Core difference

Oxford directly gives eligible for something and eligible to do something. Choose the complement according to whether the eligibility concerns an action or a noun-phrase object.

Style Boundary

This is a complement-choice guide, not a claim that eligibility itself guarantees the action or benefit.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. eligible — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Oxford University Press · Direct dictionary evidence for eligible + to-infinitive and eligible for + complement

Related guides

English Usage

Agree With vs. Agree On

Agree With vs. Agree On separates directly documented constructions and keeps the distinction narrow rather than turning a context-sensitive pattern into a universal preposition rule.

English Usage

Angry With vs. Angry About

Angry With vs. Angry About separates directly documented constructions and keeps the distinction narrow rather than turning a context-sensitive pattern into a universal preposition rule.

English Usage

Appropriate For vs. Appropriate To

Appropriate For vs. Appropriate To separates directly documented constructions and keeps the distinction narrow rather than turning a context-sensitive pattern into a universal preposition rule.

English Usage

Available To vs. Available For

Available To vs. Available For separates directly documented constructions and keeps the distinction narrow rather than turning a context-sensitive pattern into a universal preposition rule.

English Usage

Be Bound To Do vs. Bound For Somewhere

Be Bound To Do vs. Bound For Somewhere separates two distinct Oxford-documented senses. Bound to do/be expresses certainty or likelihood, while bound for + destination describes travel toward a place. The guide keeps those senses separate from legal or duty-bound uses.

English Usage

Be Elated To Do vs. Elated By Something

Be Elated To Do vs. Elated By Something compares two directly documented complement patterns for “elated.” Oxford evidence supports an infinitival use as well as elated at/by + noun phrase, so the guide explains the construction choice without generalizing from synonyms.

Explore the topic