English UsageGrammar guide

Causative Have: Have Someone Do vs. Have Something Done

A generic causative-have owner is useful because it joins two related constructions that answer different surface questions. It does not replace the older narrow “have someone do vs. have someone to do” page, which continues to own the specific bare-infinitive error after a person object.

Quick answer

Causative have has two core patterns: have + person + base verb when you arrange for a person to act, and have + thing + past participle when you arrange for something to be done. The second pattern can also describe an unwanted event affecting someone, so meaning and context matter.

Key details

Boundaryhave + object + past participle can describe arranged services or adverse experiences depending on context
Core Issuechoosing between the two main causative-have patterns
Person Patternhave + person + bare infinitive
Thing Patternhave + object + past participle

Choose the right form

Decision table for Causative Have: Have Someone Do vs. Have Something Done
QuestionUseWhy
Arranging for a person to act?have + person + base verbThe person performs the following action.
Arranging for a thing to receive an action?have + thing + past participleThe focus is the result/service, not the performer.
Describing an unwanted event affecting someone?have + object + past participle can also fitContext distinguishes adverse experience from an arranged service.

Quick tests

Causative pattern test

Is the object a person who performs the next action?

If yes: Use have + person + base verb.

If no: If the object receives the action, consider have + object + past participle.

Caveat: Check the exact construction and meaning before applying the rule mechanically.

Examples

Example

We had the electrician inspect the wiring.

A person object performs the action, so the following verb is the base form.

Example

We had the wiring inspected before moving in.

The object receives the action, so the past participle pattern is used.

Example

They had their car stolen overnight.

The same object + past participle pattern can describe an adverse experience.

Further guidance

Adverse Event

The have + object + past participle pattern can also describe something unwanted that happened to the subject: “They had their car stolen.”

Owner Boundary

The existing have-someone-do-vs-have-someone-to-do guide remains the narrow syntax owner for whether to follows the person object.

Person Pattern

Use have + person + base verb when you arrange for or cause that person to perform the action: “I had the technician check it.”

Thing Pattern

Use have + thing + past participle when the focus is on arranging for the thing to receive the action: “I had the laptop repaired.”

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. have — Cambridge English Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge Dictionary · Have + object + bare infinitive and have + object + -ing patterns in causative/event meanings
  2. Have something done — English Grammar Today (opens in a new tab)Cambridge University Press · Have + object + past participle for arranged actions and adverse experiences.

Explore the topic