English UsageGrammar guide

Awash With: Standard Pattern

Awash With: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

Quick answer

Use “awash with” when a place or situation has a very large, often excessive, amount of something.

Key details

Confusion Familyusage-construction
Rule Familyadjective or complement construction
Termsawash with

Choose the right form

Decision table for Awash With: Standard Pattern
ContextUseDecision
a place or situation contains a very large amount of somethingawash with + thing/material/contentUse “with” before what is present in unusually large quantity.
the large amount is excessive or overwhelmingawash with + unwanted/excessive contentThe construction often emphasizes abundance that feels excessive.
you only mean that a surface is literally washed by watercheck the intended sense separatelyThis guide covers the documented large-amount construction rather than every historical or literal sense of “awash.”

Quick tests

Decision test

Are you saying that a place, system, or situation contains a very large—often excessive—amount of what follows?

If yes: Use “awash with.”

If no: If you intend a different literal or specialized sense of “awash,” check that sense separately.

Caveat: Cambridge directly documents “awash with” for containing a very large or excessive amount of something; examples here stay inside that supported meaning.

Examples

Example

The inbox was awash with duplicate notifications.

“With” introduces what appeared in an unusually large amount.

Example

After the announcement, the forum was awash with speculation.

The construction emphasizes the very large amount of speculation.

Example

The market was awash with cheaply produced souvenirs.

“With” introduces the goods present in excessive abundance.

Further guidance

Construction

Use “awash with” when a place or situation has a very large, often excessive, amount of something.

Style Boundary

Cambridge also records literal liquid-related uses and American “awash in”; this page is limited to the directly evidenced “awash with” abundance pattern.

Sources and evidence

Sources are shown with the role they play in this guide. Historical or style-sensitive claims are kept within the evidence boundary described above.

  1. AWASH | English meaning — Cambridge Dictionary (opens in a new tab)Cambridge University Press · Direct Cambridge dictionary evidence for “awash with” when something contains a very large or excessive amount of something.

Related guides

English Usage

Ablaze With: Standard Pattern

Ablaze With: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

English Usage

Abound In or With: Standard Pattern

Abound In or With: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

English Usage

Absorbed In: Standard Pattern

Absorbed In: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

English Usage

Acceptable To: Standard Pattern

Acceptable To: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

English Usage

Accessible To: Standard Pattern

Accessible To: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

English Usage

Acclaimed For: Standard Pattern

Acclaimed For: Standard Pattern records a directly documented English construction and keeps guidance bounded to the evidenced pattern rather than turning one attested complement into a universal prohibition.

Explore the topic